Calla Randall has a broad practice in criminal, extradition, public and regulatory law.

Her recent cases in general crime include:

  • Successfully defending a police officer accused of GBH after he gave unnecessary CPR to a member of the public. The Crown offered no evidence after representations were made arguing that Cunningham recklessness could not be proved on the prosecution case;
  • Securing an acquittal for a man accused of strangling his ex-partner;
  • Successfully defending a victim of modern slavery accused of serious Class A drug dealing. The Crown offered no evidence after receiving a letter of representations arguing that it was not in the public interest to prosecute.

In public law, Calla represented West Yorkshire Police in a lengthy inquest into the death of a student police officer (led by Hugh Davies KC). The Coroner found that WYP had not caused or contributed to the death. Calla is currently instructed in the Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs on behalf of West Yorkshire Police (led by Hugh Davies KC). Calla is also currently defending the Metropolitan Police Service in a claim of misfeasance in public office which involves complex jurisdictional and human rights issues (led by Nicholas Yeo KC).

In extradition law, Calla has considerable experience acting for Part 1 countries throughout proceedings – from initial hearings in the Magistrates’ Court to renewal hearings in the High Court. She has frequently dealt with a wide variety of expert evidence and complicated Article 3 challenges involving country-wide thematic issues. She has also represented Part 2 countries in CMHs and bail applications in the High Court.

Legal Expertise

Crime overview

Calla defends and prosecutes as a led junior and as sole counsel. Her current and recent instructions cover the spectrum of serious crime, including GBH, drug dealing, serious sexual offences, and possession of offensive weapons (all as sole counsel).

Calla has experience dealing with vulnerable defendants and witnesses. She has made representations on fitness to plead, worked with intermediaries, and cross-examined vulnerable witnesses following ‘ground rules hearings’ (including a five-year-old child who allegedly witnessed her father being assaulted).

Calla also has an advisory practice encompassing appeals against conviction and sentence and applications for quasi-criminal orders.

Notable Crime cases

R v W (2025)

Secured the acquittal of a police officer accused of GBH after conducting unnecessary CPR on a member of the public. The Crown offered no evidence after representations were made arguing that Cunningham recklessness could not be proved on the prosecution case.

R v M (2025)

Represented a police officer accused of corrupt/improper use of police powers and two counts of ABH. The Crown offered no evidence after service of the defence statement, which raised a defence of automatism following a suspected spiking of the defendant’s drink. A toxicologist and psychiatrist were instructed.

R v O (2024)

Represented a man accused of intentional strangulation of his ex-partner. The defendant was acquitted.

R v A (2024)

Represented a man with a positive NRM referral identifying him as a victim of modern slavery who was accused of four offences of Class A PWITS. The Crown offered no evidence after representations were made arguing that it was not in the public interest to prosecute.

R v N (2023)

Secured the acquittal of a police officer accused of assaulting a more senior police officer within his force. The alleged victim’s five-year old daughter was a witness to the incident and was cross-examined at the trial.

Extradition, INTERPOL & Mutual Legal Assistance overview

Calla represents both Judicial Authorities and Requested Persons in extradition proceedings. She accepts instructions in Part 1 and Part 2 cases. Calla has extensive experience dealing with cases both at first instance in Westminster Magistrates’ Court and in the Administrative Court on appeal.

Calla completed an eight-month secondment at the CPS Extradition Unit in February 2026.

Notable Extradition, INTERPOL & Mutual Legal Assistance cases

O and O v Poland (2026)

Represented the Requesting State in a multi-handed extradition hearing which involved a significant quantity of medical evidence. The extradition of both Requested Persons was ordered.

B v Poland (2026)

Represented the Requesting State at a renewal hearing in the High Court. The case involved two expert psychiatric reports and a significant quantity of medical evidence. The Applicant served a last-minute application to admit fresh evidence which was successfully opposed applying the Fenyvesi criteria. The appeal was dismissed.

L v Poland (2026)

Represented the Requesting State in an extradition hearing involving section 2, 10, and 20 issues. The Requested Person’s extradition was ordered.

Public Law overview

Calla practises across multiple areas of public law.

Calla has represented the Metropolitan Police Service and West Yorkshire Police in multiple inquests. This has frequently involved drafting complex submissions on the applicability of Article 2, and issues of scope and disclosure.

Calla is currently instructed by West Yorkshire Police in the Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs (led by Hugh Davies KC).

Calla has also assisted other members of Chambers in a range of judicial reviews, including in the case of Watson, a seminal JR in the field of police misconduct where the court determined that police misconduct proceedings could not be brought in relation to pre-attestation conduct.

Notable Public Law cases

Grooming Gangs Inquiry (2026)

Instructed on behalf of West Yorkshire Police.

Inquest into the death of A (2025)

Represented West Yorkshire Police in an inquest involving the death of a student police officer. The Coroner found that WYP had not caused or contributed to the death.

Professional Discipline overview

Calla is regularly instructed in a wide range of professional discipline contexts including cases involving police misconduct, police vetting (under the new regulations), architectural misconduct, and the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA).

Notable Professional Discipline cases

S v MPS (2025)

Represented a police officer accused of assaulting a member of the public while off duty. The panel accepted that it was a one-off incident, and the officer received a final written warning.

B v MPS (ongoing)

Representing a police officer accused of engaging in inappropriate conduct online. Substantial arguments are being run about the Officer’s Article 8 right to a private life, and the lack of specificity in the allegations (applying the principles in Wingate). The case is currently before the Police Appeals Tribunal.

G v ARB

Representing the Architects Regulation Board in relation to a registrant accused of failing to carry out work for his clients diligently. The panel found the facts proved and found that the facts amounted to unacceptable professional conduct. The decision on sanction is pending.

G v TRA

Represented the Teaching Regulation Agency in relation to a teacher accused of serious sexual assaults involving four children. Almost all the facts were found proved, and the Teacher was prohibited from the working within the teaching profession.

Civil & Quasi-Criminal Matters overview

Calla is regularly instructed in a wide range of civil and quasi-criminal matters.

Calla has acted for multiple police forces in civil actions against the police involving claims of misuse of police powers and breaches of human rights.

Calla is also instructed in civil investigations. She was recently instructed by a national newspaper to conduct an internal investigation into allegations of sexual assault and rape made against one of its employees, after the police determined that there was insufficient evidence to bring a criminal prosecution. Calla was led by Amanda Pinto KC.

Calla is regularly instructed by the Metropolitan Police Service to advise on and appear in applications for the full range of Civil Preventative Orders, in particular sexual risk orders, sexual harm prevention orders, and stalking protection orders. Calla also has considerable experience dealing with gang injunctions which involve sensitive evidence and ex parte applications in the County Court and Youth Court, alongside related contempt of court proceedings. Calla also appears for defendants facing applications for civil orders. She recently successfully resisted an application for an interim SRO on the basis that the defendant (a teacher accused of serious sexual offences against underage students) was already subject to restrictive bail conditions.

Calla has also assisted the Metropolitan Police Service in drafting production orders, most notably in a case involving the prosecution of an alleged war criminal.

Notable Civil & Quasi-Criminal Matters cases

K v MPS (2026 – ongoing)

Currently acting for the Metropolitan Police Service in a claim of misfeasance in public office arising from the conviction of a Kenyan man for the murder and kidnap of two British tourists in 2011 (led by Nicholas Yeo KC).

A v MPS (2025 – ongoing)

Currently acting for West Yorkshire Police in a claim arising from the death of a student police officer. The Claimant alleges that the police breached the deceased’s article 2 rights by failing to prevent his death (led by John Beggs KC).

Project Y (2025)

Instructed by a national newspaper to conduct an internal investigation into allegations of sexual assault and rape made against one of its employees (led by Amanda Pinto KC).

  • Young Fraud Lawyers Association
  • City University, Bar Vocational Course (Distinction / Outstanding) (2022)
  • City University, Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction) (2021)
  • Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, MPhil in Music and Evolutionary Anthropology (2020)
  • Magdalen College, University of Oxford, BA in Music (First Class Honours) (2019)

Awards

  • Major Scholarship, (BVS), Inner Temple (2021)
  • Duke of Edinburgh’s Award, (BVS), Inner Temple (2021)
  • Exhibition, (GDL/BVS), Inner Temple (2020-21)
  • Fondation Bay Scholarship, Queens’ College, Cambridge University (2019)
  • Frere Benefaction (for making an outstanding contribution to Magdalen College) (2018)
  • Academic Exhibition, Magdalen College, Oxford University (2017-19)
  • Music Scholarship, Magdalen College, Oxford University (2017-19)
  • Crown Prosecution Service (General Crime) Level 1

Calla has volunteered with the Schools Consent Project and the Covid-19 Taskforce on Domestic Violence. As a law student she was a regular contributor to the UK Human Rights Blog, reporting on new caselaw, NGO and UN reports, and legislative changes.

Before coming to the Bar Calla performed extensively as a classical flautist, including appearances as a soloist, in ensemble, and as an orchestral musician at venues including Wigmore Hall; Queen Elizabeth Hall; Bridgewater Hall; Nottingham Royal Centre; The Sage, Gateshead; Birmingham Symphony Hall, and The Hexagon.

I, Calla Randall, am a data controller and can be contacted at 3 Raymond Buildings, Gray’s Inn, London WC1R 5BH or by telephone on 020 7400 6400 or by email at calla.randall@3rblaw.com.  My Data Protection Policy can be found here.

All personal data that I process is for the purposes of providing legal services, conducting conflict-checks, marketing, defending potential complaints, legal proceedings or fee disputes, keeping anti-money laundering records, training other barristers and pupils and when providing work-shadowing opportunities, and/or exercising a right to a lien.  The types of data I process vary upon the nature of the legal matter in relation to which I am engaged to advise, but can include names, contact details, biographic details and ‘special category personal data’ (such as details of racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, health, sex life and criminal convictions and proceedings).

Depending upon the circumstances of the case, the legal bases upon which I process personal data are (i) the performance of a contract to which the data subject is a party or in order to take steps at the request of the data subject prior to entering into a contract, (ii) the processing is necessary to comply with legal obligations to which I am subject, or (iii) the processing is necessary for the legitimate interests set out above, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subjects which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.  When I rely on (iii) legitimate interests, my ‘Legitimate Interests Assessment’ can be found here.  When I process data which has not been obtained directly from the data subject (e.g. personal data contained in evidential materials), it will have been supplied to me as part of my instructions in circumstances covered by legal professional privilege.

Depending upon the circumstances of the case, I may share the personal data with:

  1. my Chambers, which supplies professional and administrative support to my practice;
  2. Courts and other tribunals to whom documents are presented;
  3. my lay and professional clients;
  4. potential witnesses, in particular experts, and friends or family of the data subject;
  5. solicitors, barristers, pupils, mini pupils and other legal representatives;
  6. ombudsmen and regulatory authorities;
  7. current, past or prospective employers;
  8. education and examining bodies;
  9. business associates, professional advisers and trade bodies.

I retain personal data for no longer than 7 years after the case has come to an end or as otherwise required by law.

I do not intend to transfer data to any country which is not either within the European Union, or otherwise permitted by UK data protection legislation.

Under the UK GDPR, data subjects whose personal data I process have the right to request from me access to, and rectification or erasure of, their personal data, the right to the restriction of processing concerning them, the right to object to processing as well as the right to data portability.  Data subjects also have the right to lodge a complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ico.org.uk).

In cases where there is a contract between me and the data subject, the provision of personal data is a contractual requirement and the data subject is obliged to provide the personal data in order that I can supply legal services.  A failure to provide such data may mean that I will not be able to provide those legal services.

Rev 2.1 29.09.2023

Data Protection Policy

Legitimate Interests Assessment

Related news